Summary
You can build your own microphone to perform frequency response measurements with sufficient accuracy for crossover design, without spending much money.  A few well-chosen parts and a an hour's work is all it takes!


Figure 1 -- Panasonic electret capsule


Figure 1a -- Panasonic electret capsule, standard wiring


Figure 2 -- Mic capsule with ground lead removed


Figure 3 -- Completed DIY mic piggybacked on commerically available "Mitey Mike 2"


Figure 4 -- Measurement comparison of DIY mic and MM2


Figure 5 -- Measurement comparison of DIY mic and MM2

 


One problem most people have when starting to test their speakers using computer-based testing software and hardware is the mic. The mic is arguably the most important piece of the process, but the availability of high-quality, commercial mics with relatively flat response from at least 20hz to 20khz is low and those that are available are quite expensive. The cheapest mic on the market that has been regarded as accurate is the Mitey Mike II, designed by Joe D'Appolito. The MM2 is sold with the CLIO testing hardware/software for $110 or sold separately for $179 (calibrated, $139 uncalibrated) through Old Colony Sound Labs.

I purchased the MM2 when I bought the CLIO system because it is calibrated by Joe, himself, and I wanted to be sure that my investment in CLIO wasn't wasted with a poor quality testing mic.  I have no complaints or regrets about purchasing the MM2.  But those of you needing a good testing mic for use with free programs like Speaker Workshop or some of the high-quality commercial products like LspCad, Soundeasy, or LspLAB (no longer available) probably don't want to shell out an extra $140-$200 if you don't have to, right?  Well, you don't.  Plain and simple, you can build a mic using the same electret capsule that goes into the Mitey Mike II for chump change, leaving some money leftover for nice drivers to test.

The MM2 uses a variant of the Panasonic WM60AY electret capsule, available from Digikey for $2.64 apiece as part number P9959-ND. I'm not sure that the MM2 uses this exact capsule since Panasonic makes a wide variety of almost identical electret mic elements, but the response is nearly identical which is all that matters (the sensitivity may be different, but the calibration is what you give up by building it yourself.  This won't cause you much trouble, since exact sensitivity calibration will only let you measure the exact sensitivity of a speaker.  When designing a speaker, dealing in relative terms is all that matters.

The whole process for building this mic yourself should take under an hour, but you'll need a few things.  Of course, you'll want to call Digikey and order a few of these elements (I suggest getting a couple of extras since they're hard to solder and you might pork up one or two).  Next, you should get some 30awg Kynar wire from Radio Shack or wherever you normally buy 30awg Kynar.  I bought some red and some blue just to keep them straight.  You can buy whatever colors you want, or just a single color and mark one lead with an ink marker.  Also, some heat shrink tubing is good for sealing the whole thing up at the end.  A brass wand is the a good mounting device, as well, and is what the MM2 uses.  Finally, make sure your soldering iron has a fine point tip on it.  If not, the 15W soldering iron at Radio Shack costs about $7 and is useful for fine soldering applications like this.  Assuming you have the soldering iron already, a roll of Kynar wire and some heat shrink tubing is going to cost you about $5.00.  As for the cable that will connect your mic to your PC, that will depend on the type of connector you need -- minijack or RCA. Clio has RCA jacks, but most soundcards have minijacks on them. Either way, the way to get the connects and cable is to buy a good quality minijack or RCA cable of a sufficient length to go from your mic to your PC or preamp.  Don't go buying Monster cable or anything like that.  I used a 10' RCA cable that was sitting in my big box 'o cables.  I cut one end off and stripped the leads.

Shown in Figure 1 is the panasonic element in my "helping hands" thingy that I got at "the shack" a few years ago.  It's really a great little tool for under $10.  The first thing you need to realize is that these capsules are tiny.  They're about 1/2 the size of the capsules that Radio Shack sells and they work much, much better.  Also, in figure 1, notice that one of the terminals is grounded to the case via a small drop of solder (more on this later). You can go ahead and solder a wire to each terminal and use the one that comes from the terminal grounded to the case as the (-) lead and the other as the (+) lead to attach to your RCA jack or minijack.  You want to keep the phase straight, if possible, but remember that your amp or preamp may invert the phase.  So, prior to importing your data into a crossover design program, check your impulse response -- if the initial impulse goes up, you're all set.  Otherwise, reverse the phase (do this by reversing the leads going to the speaker or driver you're testing).  This is important if your crossover design software uses the phase imported from your measurement equipment.  I use Calsod Pro and strip the phase data from my frequency response data, to allow Calsod to calculate the minimum phase (and be sure to read Dave Ralph's article on modeling the "tails", but that's beyond the scope of this article).

But wait.  That's too easy.  And the truth is that it really is that easy... unless you want to get fancy.  If you do (and I think you do), read on.  Otherwise, connect and twist your wires, as shown in figure 1a, and attach them to your cable that will run to your computer, cover the thing with heat shrink tubing (I use a thin piece to hold the wires and a thicker one to hold the case to the wires for stress relief to make sure you dont accidentally pull the wires off the terminals on the capsule.)

Here's the "fancy" part.  We're going to make one slight modification suggested by Sigfried Linkwitz (of Linkwitz-Riley fame) that will improve the SPL handling of the mic and reduce distortion.  This modification requires you to cut the lead that connects the ground terminal to the case and dab a little silver solder to connect the other terminal to the case (where the (+)  lead connects).  I have no idea why this works, so don't ask.  If you think there's something wrong with this, please take it up with Sigfried.  It does work, though.

Figure 2 illustrates what the capsule looks like after I scratched the lead to the case off with a sharp utility knife.  After connecting the wires, I dabbed some solder to connect the lower lead (use the dot for reference) to the case and connected up my wires to the cable.  As I said, I don't know  why this works better, but I've built it both ways and it's worth the little extra effort.  When connecting your wires to the case, if you screw one up, it's likely to be because you had trouble with the solder.  If that happens, get some desoldering braid from radio shack and remove any errant solder before starting over (or just chuck the screwed-up capsule in the trash and go at it with a fresh one).  Also, with the Kynar wire, strip about 1/4" of the insulation off the end, then use snippers to cut the exposed portion of wire down to about 1/16".  Lay the exposed portion of the wire onto the solder dab of the capsule's terminal and touch the tip of the soldering iron to the wire.  The solder on the capsule should melt quite quickly and the exposed kynar wire will sink in. Hold the wire for about 10 seconds while the solder hardens and then continue onto the second lead.  Once done with that, go back and drop a dab of solder to connect the appropriate lead to the case.  IMPORTANT: use a multimeter set to test for conductivity to check and make sure that 1) you have fully cut the original connection between the terminal and the case; 2) that your connected wires are connected only to the appropriate terminals; and 3) that the case is connected to the appropriate terminal.

Figure 3 shows my nice, new DIY testing mic (top) piggybacked on the Mitey Mike for some comparative testing.  And how did it do?  Pretty darn fine!  Figure 4 is a response curve for a 5 1/4" woofer on an 8" baffle made with the MM2 and overlayed with the response obtained with our DIY mic.  There's no point telling you which curve is for which mic... there's virtually no difference (and from a crossover design standpoint, there is absolutely no difference that would affect the design of the speaker whatsoever).

Next, figure 5 is a comparison of highpass measurements.  This is where you see the only real difference between the mics.  The Mitey Mike produced the curve that is slightly below the curve for the DIY mic from about 5khz to 20khz (where they meet).  The difference is about 1 db and could slightly affect the selection of tweeter padding resistors and possibly alter your choice in highpass caps (very, very slightly).  Most likely, this difference is due to the fact that the tweeter measurement was obtained with the mics piggybacked on one another, causing a slight reflection off the lower mic that caused a slight increase in SPL at the upper mic (the DIY mic).  The woofer measurements were taken with each mic individually mounted.  For that reason, there's really no difference between the mics making it worth spending $179 plus shipping.  If I knew then what I know now, I'd have saved the $110 bucks I paid for the calibrated mic (the price when you buy it with Clio) and spent it on beer, CD's, or whatever.  To be honest, the difference in response when factoring the calibration file for my Mitey Mike are so small, accurate crossover design can be accomplished without calibrating these capsules.

That's it. Good luck!


Copyright 2001-2002, Wayne Jaeschke
Unauthorized reproduction prohibited

All text and images copyright Wayne Jaeschke, 2000-2002.
 You must read and agree to the terms of service